Political Opinions contains 1 article.

Nigel Farage, UKIP & Europe - a bigger picture?
Posted by Doug Walters on 16th May 2014
Farage & UKIP

I recently attended a couple of UKIP meetings – one in Barrow where the speaker was Paul Nuttall, deputy leader of the UKIP party and a MEP; the second in Manchester (I happened to be in Manchester for an Action for Children Board meeting the following morning, so paid half-price membership of UKIP for the right to attend) where there were 3 speakers: Steven Woolfe, a local man (born & educated in Manchester, now a Barrister and MEP candidate), Louise van de Bours (a former Mayoress of Congleton and MEP candidate) and Nigel Farage. The meetings were very different:

Meeting 1 – was attended by a small audience that was quite varied in terms of age group, sex (including a very “camp” couple) and socio-economic background (as far as I could guess from dress, content and manner of speech.) Questions from the floor were very well-informed from attendees both for and against the UKIP propositions. The audience exhibited no signs (overt or otherwise) of racism. Paul Nuttall’s speech focussed on two themes: immigration and the shortcomings of the EU bureaucracy (non-democratic, cost, impact on UK sovereignty.) He made some telling points, which I think is very easy to do – whatever you think of the EU as a concept, any sane individual has to accept that its implementation is a mess. Most of the questions from the floor were “friendly” even though well-informed. There were some interesting questions about the actual mechanics of unravelling our membership if UKIP were successful, revealing that it would be an endeavour which would certainly keep the legal profession in full employment for a long-time.

I asked two questions: a) more of an observation – that the focus on immigration has the unfortunate effect of coupling UKIP with the BNP in the minds of the “sensible” sections of the voting public – it seemed to me that a focus on ensuring that benefits were less lucrative than working, and limiting immigrants’ entitlement to benefits was a better way to achieve the same end, because it would encourage local people to take the jobs that are available (too many are better off on benefits than working for the minimum wage and / or on zero hours contracts) without the racist overtones of a policy that focusses directly on immigration. Paul Nuttall’s response was lengthy but lacked any substance other than “immigration is the topic popular with the voters at thie upcoming elections” b) my second question was to ask what UKIP would do about filling the political and military void which would be created by the break-up of the EU (with obvious reference to the current Ukraine crisis.) I pointed out that a symbolic but largely irrelevant increase in UK defence spending (as proposed by UKIP) was unlikely to cut it – would they seek to re-affirm the role of NATO and cooperate in Europe through that mechanism? Paul Nuttall effectively ignored the question.

Meeting 2 – was attended by a fairly homogenous audience of 50+ year old, white people. There was a couple of people who were clearly of Asian (a Turban), European (accent) or Caribbean / African (skin colour) extraction (presumably second or third generation) but this was a very small group. While I think that this fairly reflects the UKIP constituency, it is important to remember that this is also the same group which predominates the audience at meetings of the other British political parties.

The speech by Louise van de Bours was simply a cheerleading, "rah-rah" speech. I ended up taking no notes from this. The opening speech was from Steven Woolfe was very good – it drew strongly on the themes of roots (Peterlee Massacre, his upbringing in Longsight and studying for exams in the local library) to link into the arguments about the aspirations of the working class and the rights of the people to a democratic voice, thereby landing a series of very telling blows on the EU / Sovereignty and Immigration / Jobs issues. This was a much subtler approach than that of Paul Nuttall a few days earlier, but the same themes really.

Obviously, the main event was the speech by Nigel Farage. Of course he was speaking to a friendly audience (so I was a bit surprised he felt the need to be flanked by 4 well-dressed but nevertheless thuggish-looking bodyguards) but he was very accomplished. Again, he avoided the Immigration issue, mentioning the word only once, in response to a question from the floor. He explained that he was in favour of immigration, if based on a points-system similar to that employed by Australia.

Farage’s speech, like that from Woolfe, was heavily laced with stirring historical references, such as to Sir Robert Peel (the son of a Bury mill-owner, who re-introduced a more caring conservatism through such measures as the Factory Act and the Repeal of the Corn Laws. He also invoked the spirit of Churchill and his “Voice in the Wilderness” years until the annexation of the Sudetenland (shades of Crimea and Ukraine?) The theme was the loss of sovereignty and the undemocratic nature of the EU constitution. The other main theme was the fact (and it is a fact) hat modern politicians are disconnected from the rest of the populace – there might as well be a moat (and duck house?) around the village of Westminster, with the drawbridge only lowered every 4 years when the politicians “re-connect” to woo your vote (although I’d argue that isn’t true democracy either.) Instinctively, I feel this disconnection between the professional politician and the electorate (and therefore the disenfranchisement of the latter) is at the root of UKIP’s popularity.

“Nigel farage enjoying a pint at the Westminster Arms - how many of our media-intimidated and politically-correct Politicos would allow themselves to be "snapped" in this sort of pose?”

Read the full article...

Sign up for extra content

Register here to access premium content - the only information we require is your user name and a valid email address

Follow me

Latest private posts

Latest public posts

—17th July 2015
—1st July 2015
—1st July 2014